Montykins Logo

April 21, 2005

No Hitchhiking

I'm worried about the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy movie. Very worried. So worried that I don't think I'll even be seeing it.

Before I get into this, long experience has shown me that I must make myself very, very clear. So:

  • I have not seen Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
  • It might be a good movie. I don't know. I haven't seen it.
  • Even if the things I'm worried about come to pass, it's entirely possible that other people might enjoy the movie.

Okay? We all clear on this? It hasn't even come out yet as I write this. If you like the movie, please don't email me telling me I'm an idiot. I'm not saying it's a bad movie. I'm saying I'm worried that it might be.

Okay, enough covering myself. My point is this: I've seen the trailers and commercials and it just doesn't look like Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Normally, I try not to care about this sort of thing. Accuracy to source material is irrelevant to whether a movie is any good or not. I enjoyed The X-Men on its own merits and didn't obsess over the way they changed Rogue's character by giving her Kitty Pryde's personality. That didn't matter, largely because they got the tone right.

But it turns out that I care a lot more about The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy than I thought. I look at the commercials, which are full of people falling over and getting hit in the face. And shouting. I'd feel a lot better if they showed, say, a thirty-second Marvin monologue. Because let's face it, Hitchhiker's shouldn't be an action movie. The comedy comes from turns of phrase and wry narration, not from slapstick.

It's not that I want the movie to be exactly the book, or exactly the tv show, or the radio show, or even the text adventure. But it doesn't look like this adaptation carries with it the essential Hitchhikeriness that has always gone along with the title. And that makes me so sad that I don't think I'm even going to see the movie, because I don't think I can stand to see something I care this much for (and it really surprises me to find out just how much I do care for it) made into a travesty.

I've read a review or two, and now I'm going to get into a couple of spoilers.

Again, spoilers.

I'm not kidding. I'm about to list a few things that are not in the movie, and if you want to keep from knowing these things, you really shouldn't keep reading.



Okay? Here we go. This is from Planet Magrathea, the Douglas Adams site run by M.J. Simpson, who's written articles and books on Douglas Adams for years and has recently decided to stop because of the massive negative backlash he got for his (extremely) negative review of the movie. I am hoping to avoid any such negative backlash by reminding you that I haven't seen the movie yet, so I could be entirely wrong.

Specifically, the following bits are not in the movie:

  • "They were 'on display' in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of the leopard.'"

    Okay, I realize that not every line is going to be in there. But this is one of my favorites. I think it was the line that hooked me. I'll be sad to see the Arthur-Prosser scene not include it. But I can get past that.

  • Most of the Vogon poetry scene, including most of the poem itself

    Really? Really? They've got the book narration covering up the Vogon poetry? That's rough. Not just because the poem is entertaining (especially if they somehow decided to include the line "Why not then? Moose." from the Infocom game) but because the structure of the scene does seem like it needs to demonstrate how bad the poetry really is.

  • Most of the Deep Thought scenes, including Vroomfondel and Majikthise

    Apparently there are plot changes (according to this) which change the whole Deep Thought setup. So this is more "I'm sad they cut my pet lines" than "They've destroyed the source material!" Even so, I can accept only so much pet-line cutting before I give up, you know?

  • The Guide Entry on Earth

    What? Are you kidding? Are you kidding? The bit about "Harmless" and "Mostly Harmless" are just . . . not in the movie?

  • The Guide Entry on Towels

    Ooookay.

    The towels are essential to Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Absolutely essential. You can't do the movie without that scene. If there isn't "Hey, you sass that hoopy Ford Prefect? Now there's a frood who really knows where his towel is," then . . . it ain't Hitchhiker's. It's just not.

Now, some of the above could be wrong. I hope it is. Because it suggests to me that the filmmakers just don't get Hitchhiker's at all. And that, as previously established, makes me sad.



Comments

You must know that being clear won't help. This is the internet.

Posted by: Strega at April 21, 2005 09:19 PM

You are, of course, correct. But this will make me feel better about yelling at people who didn't read the disclaimers.

Posted by: Monty at April 21, 2005 09:22 PM

Hey -- this reminds me. I'd sure like to play the infocom game again. Heck, I'd like to play all the infocom games again. Even that sappy pirate romance one which was the only one I ever won without looking at a clue.

Oh, and yeah. I agree about the Hitchhiker's movie. I think I'll just read the books again.

Posted by: Robin at April 21, 2005 10:20 PM

I've got a cd of all the Infocom games; I play through them every few years.

But you can play the Hitchhiker's Infocom game online! http://www.douglasadams.com/creations/infocomjava.html

Posted by: Monty at April 21, 2005 10:24 PM

Infocom, ah the memories.

I have built an entire career based on the fact that a nine year old girl was given an Apple IIe and allowed to play Hitchhicker's Guide to the Galaxy and Abuse, along with some other fine pieces of Infocom software... but, this isn't her story.

Instead, it's really about a man who is already predispositioned to not see a movie whose subject matter bears a striking resemblance to a great piece of science fiction/comedy literature because that resemblance may in fact be an illusion.

Then again, maybe he just lost his towel.

Posted by: at April 21, 2005 11:17 PM

But . . . but . . . towel!!

(I wasn't 12 years old and lugging a towel around with me everywhere I went because I had a crush on Ford Prefect, nossir, not me.)

I'll still see the movie, but I know to go into it as detached as I can be.

Posted by: Marissa at April 22, 2005 05:54 AM

I'll consider myself lucky to have just read Hitch-Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy once, so I'll go see the movie. THEN I will go back and read all the HH books, and I will see what a mockey the movie really is. It's the only way.

Posted by: Coleen at April 22, 2005 05:58 AM

I am glad I am not the only Hitchhiker fan who is afraid that the movie is going to fall dreadfully short of my high expectations. Everytime I see a commercial for it, I think of all the kids who will see the movie and be fans, but never having read the books the goodness and awesomeness will be totally lost on them.

Like the Police song "Puff Daddy" covered when the Notorious B.I.G. died...I actually head some kid say "Whoa, this band TOTALLY ripped off Puffy!"

Posted by: b at April 22, 2005 05:58 AM

I think all fans of Thgttg are concened about the movie, me included, of course.
I thought I wasn't going to see it, but I changed my mind. At least later I'll be able to bitch about how bad it was ;)

What disturbed me in the trailers most is how they included all the classic tricks to get people to come and see the movie. It gives the impression the movie isn't made really well, but they're still hoping to convince people, who don't even know the book, to come and see it.

I wish Adams was still alive, I suppose the movie would be quite different then...

Posted by: U at April 22, 2005 06:09 AM

I am also so very, very afraid.

Posted by: Alison at April 22, 2005 06:41 AM

Yes, definitely afraid. The trailers look as disappointing as the ones for I, Robot. A classic destroyed for a new generation of fans who will never read Asimov as more than an "Independence Day"-esque writer instead of the genius that he is. Such a shame that it looks as though they have done the same to Adams.

Posted by: heidy at April 22, 2005 07:12 AM

I heard the same thing. I think... I think I shall panic. And probably not see the movie.

Posted by: Nicolas at April 22, 2005 07:13 AM

I'm desperately hoping that this is just a case of them making a bad trailer. You know how there's those movies that the studios just can't figure out how to sell? Hitchhiker's seems like it would be exactly that kind of movie.

I get to live in my bubble of denial for another week.

Posted by: Cleo256 at April 22, 2005 09:54 AM

I told my friends about the site. They are in as much shock as I am. Wer'e going to find our towels and cry on April 29th. This is an outrage, and I hope Douglas Adams curses this movie from beyond.

Posted by: Divaah46 at April 22, 2005 01:51 PM

I just yesterday bought "The Ultimate Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy." There's a preface written by Douglas Adams, so I'm not exactly sure how old it is. He goes through all the various incarnations of Hitchhiker and does warn that the movie (which has apparently been in the works for years) is very different from the book.

Posted by: Shack at April 22, 2005 08:51 PM

I do care an awful lot for the books, and I explain the importance of towels to anyone who will listen (and even some who don't). I worry about the movie but I want to see it on the off chance they got at least some things right. And if we don't see the thing and it tanks or semi-tanks, how will we give it the precision-mocking it deserves?

Posted by: renee at April 27, 2005 08:16 AM

Syndicate this site (XML)